1X2 prediction Schwentek about a double rebound in the match with Navarro: I was not sure and thought that this was the work of the judge on the tower. I was waiting for a video recovery

AI soccer news

Iga Schwentek commented on the judicial mistake in the match forecast by ai 1x2 soccer prediction with Emma Navarro. Eve Askderaki did not notice a double rebound after the blow of Polka. As a result, the Schwentek won 6:1, 6:2.
- at the beginning of the second set there was a rally during which a double rebound occurred. What have you seen for your part? Have you examined after watching a repetition or before it is the opportunity to give this draw to the ash?
- To be honest, I did not see a repeat after the draw, because at that moment I wanted to maintain concentration and did not look at the screens. I did not want this draw to populate in my head for a long time. I was not sure if it was a double rebound or I hit the ball of the racket on the ball. It was difficult to say because I ran very quickly. I don`t remember if the ball was seen. Don`t know. Sometimes you just don`t look at the ball during a blow. So I was not sure. I thought it was a judge`s work on the tower. I also waited for a video recovery, but I did not see it, so I just continued and was already concentrated on the next draw.
- We have special technologies and the possibility of repetition, it seems to you, is it worth changing the conditions for the video recovery? Emma could not use it because she continued the draw. She hit the ball, but . . .
- I think this is the same situation as with the Challengs before the emergence of the electronic system. Everything should be smooth, because the response system is the same. And the stop of the draw. But, to be honest, I myself have not done this yet and my rivals, so I don`t know yet.
- to clarify the situation - Emma said that she could not use the repetition, because she did not stop during the draw.
- Okay.
- Do you think it is necessary to change this rule so that the judge can see the repeat after the draw and make the right decision?
- I don`t know. I have never plunged into it deeply - now it will have to. Honestly, this is the first time that something similar happened to me, so I`m not sure. But I think they already had enough time to think about everything. So if there was some best option, then in tennis it would already be used. We already had some tense situations in other matches, as well as in the meetings of the ATP tour last year. Judges think about it. This is their work - to establish fair rules.
Schwentek`s cruelty on Australian Open - gave 14 gams in 5 matches. This has not happened since Sharapova
1X2 prediction - more details and information: 1X2 prediction

AI soccer news